Uncategorized

Sudan: Restrictions and Insecurity Obstruct Vital Medical Care in Sudan


As the conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) enters its third month, rampant violence and huge health needs persist across Sudan, particularly in Khartoum and Darfur.

Although Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) teams are running medical projects, our ability to scale up activities is being impeded by extensive and obstructive administrative and bureaucratic restrictions. If the situation persists, it will be impossible for our teams to provide the adequate medical and humanitarian response that people desperately need.

“People are dying while the country’s health system buckles under the weight of overwhelming needs,” says Jean Nicolas Armstrong Dangelser, MSF emergency coordinator in Sudan.

“By subjecting people to shocking levels of violence, or by restricting medical organisations from helping them, the warring parties in Sudan are showing a complete disregard for civilian lives.”

Since the outbreak of the conflict, we have expanded or reoriented pre-existing projects and launched new activities. In just five weeks, our surgical teams working in the Bashair teaching hospital in south Khartoum treated 1,169 patients, over 900 of whom had suffered violent trauma.

Since the onset of the fighting, the MSF supported hospital in El Fasher, north Darfur, carried out over 600 surgeries for war-wounded people, or women requiring emergency obstetric care. Among other activities, MSF provides paediatric, malnutrition and maternal health services, runs mobile clinics and provides medical and water and sanitation services to displaced people.

Despite working in 11 states, the scale of our activities in Sudan is in no way commensurate with the huge needs faced by the people.

We have striven to increase our activities but these attempts have been consistently hindered by both warring parties, despite their many public commitments to the facilitation of humanitarian assistance, including those formally set out in the Jeddah Declaration of Commitment to Protect the Civilians of Sudanhttps://reliefweb.int/report/sudan/jeddah-declaration-commitment-protect-civilians-sudan.

By subjecting people to shocking levels of violence, or by restricting medical organisations from helping them, the warring parties in Sudan are showing a complete disregard for civilian lives. Jean Nicolas Armstrong Dangelser, MSF emergency coordinator in Sudan

Tweet this

One MSF team, including experienced emergency medical staff, was blocked from travelling from Port Sudan to areas with greater medical needs. Unable to travel, the team launched water and sanitation activities in camps for displaced people and trained Sudanese medical staff in responding to mass casualty events.

These small scale, non-lifesaving activities, had far less impact than what could have been achieved had the team been able to reach areas with greater medical needs. Medics in the team didn’t treat a single patient.

“Why, upon second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh daily requests and dialogues with humanitarian and intelligence authorities were our permits to travel back to Khartoum and River Nile states rejected?” says Dr Javid Abdelomoneim, a Sudanese-British doctor and MSF medical team leader, who recently returned from Sudan.

“Weeks later my entire team, amongst them medical, logistical and operational colleagues were still sitting in Port Sudan.”

Despite the clear and overwhelming needs of people:

In some locations, authorities have repeatedly impeded the movement of humanitarian and medical staff and supplies between and within states. Requests for permits to travel submitted on time and with requisite paperwork by MSF have been delayed, rejected, rescinded, or plainly not respected, all without clear reasons being given.

Even when permits were issued, in some cases our staff and supplies have been turned back by security personnel at checkpoints, sometimes with staff harassed, threatened or detained.

In some locations, authorities have indicated that armed escorts would be required for supply movements, reducing the ability to move unimpeded and undermining the independence and neutrality of humanitarian organisations and staff.

Despite repeated applications and requests, the Sudanese authorities have issued significantly fewer visas than MSF requires to bring in sufficient staff to respond to the immense needs of the Sudanese people. Although some visas have been issued, the process is inconsistent and unreliable. At present, MSF can only hope that staff will be issued a visa when making an application, this uncertainty makes it hard to plan for scaling up activities with any degree of confidence and can jeopardise the future of existing activities. Additional staff are critical to expanding the provision of medical services, and to rotate medical teams, who are working around the clock, in and out of the country.