Latest

Russia’s Ukraine stand change raises G20 document hopes » Capital News


NEW DELHI, India Jul 24 – The government is seeing some gains following Russia recalibrating its stance on the mention of the Ukraine conflict in the chair’s summary at two G20 ministerial meetings but is keeping a wary eye on the outcome of subsequent talks in the lead up to the leader’s summit in about 50 days.

Until now and as recently as at the meeting of G20 finance ministers and central bank governors in Gandhinagar this month, the “outcome document and chair’s summary” acknowledged Russia having “dissociated itself from the status of this document as a common outcome” due to the reference to the war in three paragraphs.

At the meeting of labour ministers in Indore and energy ministers in Goa, the phrasing underwent a change as it was noted that Russia “recognises the status of the document as the chair’s summary” with the inclusion of a para(concerning the Ukraine conflict), while agreeing with the rest. 

Russian acquiescence in the mention of the Ukraine conflict was significant, even though “it expressed its distinct view on the situation in Ukraine, geopolitical tensions and sanctions during the meeting,” the footnote said.

At the meeting of the energy ministers in Goa, which ended on Saturday, the same text was repeated, although Russia also expressed its concern over some of the contents related to climate change and ways to deal with it.

Russian acquiescence in the mention of the Ukraine conflict was significant, even though “it expressed its distinct view on the situation in Ukraine, geopolitical tensions and sanctions during the meeting,” the footnote said.

At the meeting of the energy ministers in Goa, which ended on Saturday, the same text was repeated, although Russia also expressed its concern over some of the contents related to climate change and ways to deal with it.

Significantly, while Russia has come around to agree to the reference to the mention of war over Ukraine, China has stuck to its stance on G20 not being the “right platform” to address security issues and has opposed the inclusion of the geopolitical content.

While government officials still see a unanimous document an uphill task, given the widely divergent views between some powerful members of the grouping of 20 largest economies, they see even modest success towards consenus as significant. 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *